The 4th Bomb
The Book That Shook MI5
BBC Conspiracy Files II Debunked
The BBC documentary avoided explaining the bandaged man's strange behavior and movements that morning.
As a 7/7 eyewitness whose testimony blew a hole in the government story I fully expected to receive some negative coverage, but it never materialised. Maybe the blanket media ban imposed by Jonathan Evans in 2007 was still in force (the wariness of many journalists I’ve met and many cutting room floors may attest to this) as they fear drawing attention to my eye witness account of events as written in .
BBC CONSPIRACY FILES II DOCUMENTARY
I viewed this documentary with interest as I was the first person the BBC initially approached in 2007, even before J7. They also passed on it after hearing of Rachel North’s involvement leading to Nick Kollerstrom’s appearance in it.
—Daniel Obachike
Sky's live footage on the morning of 7/7 shows 2 agents ready and waiting for someone...
If you look carefully you might recognise someone familiar walking towards them
Previously walking unassisted, now limping heavily before his even more unconvincing display rolling on the ground wailing in Tavistock Square.
BBC Conspiracy Files II Glaring Ommissons
(1) The first glaring omission from the documentary was the bandaged mans appearence at 2 bombing aftermaths, Piccadily tube then Tavistock Square, led from one to the next by 2 intelligence operatives.
This coincides with reports from British Medical Association staff that morning of men posing as injured and hopping on trolleys to gain access to the treatment centres to spy on survivors/witnesses for media containment.
(2) The next was how Richard Jones’ lies were repeated in the BBC documentary verbatim without offering any evidence he was ever on the bus. Neither did it explain what he was doing being filmed at the Piccadilly square evacuation point at the exact time he claimed he was on the bus.
In conclusion
Does the BBC’s hachet job on the UK 7/7 truth movement cripple it?
The UK truth movement has been infiltrated and comandeered by We Are Change UK M.O.D workers who focus not on the London 7/7 truth but on semantics of the 9/11 attacks in the U.S. They do this and grow their fan base by piggy-backing every fleeting protest, truth figure or point of public scrutiny as a means to further mark themselves as anti-establishment.
To conclude I believe the BBC’s documentary (In which one of We Are Change U.K’s hit pieces feature) only entrenches many of the misgivings any clear-thinking people have about 7/7 so in the long run it will have done the real quest for truth a favour and I look forward to watching/appearing in BBC Conspiracy files III!
11 Comments
Leave a Response
It would appear that they have yet to work out that when it comes to the Truth Movement, there is no such thing as bad publicity. I think we should all thank the BBC for the thousands of people they have just sent our way (again).
Lying by ommision is particularly helpful to our cause; I am increasingly beginning to think that the people making these programs aren’t particularly keen on their mission statement, either that or there just a bit, well, ‘special’. If the first option is the case, to whom it may concern, I offer my heartfelt gratitude; if the second, keep smoking what your smoking and don’t be a bogart, hand that stuff round the rest of the office!
Yep, I saw the programme, before I was roughly of the view that islamist suicide bombers were responsible, but I noticed that the programme was pretty much a propaganda film disguised as a documentary and it was clear that the whole truth wasn’t being presented… I’ve since been doing daily research on 7/7 and become very sceptical of the official story. So yes, I’d say the Conspiracy Files has certainly done the cause of 7/7 truth a massive favour, there are probably many others who reacted the same way as me
i’m sure that many people will realise that the CT series is x-files-like entertainment. it would be interesting to ask some final year journalism students or professionals to analyse it. panorma have never investigated the issues and i’ve emailed them to ask why. unsurprisingly, i’ve had no response. perhaps greg palast, donal macintyre or roger cook might want to pick up the gauntlet.
panorama didnt investigate it as panorama is a bbc programme, the same bbc that the goverment own and control. understand now?
Please explain to me what the point is of “fake” casualties at a real explosion site?????
Government operative’s posing as innocent bypassers came to the aid of victims (some fake, some genuine) and used them to gain access to emergency rooms and hospitals wards so they could keep an eye on survivors, witnesses, etc.
Have you heard of any stories related to survivors and/or witnesses who encountered with this people?? Have they been brainwashed or put under pressure to think and/or talk in a different direction ??
Yes. Two women bus bomb survivors said they saw a black man acting agitatedly (Me, late for work) on the bus’s lower deck to a nurse treating them at UCL hospital. Somehow this got reported. But days later this was pulled from all media sources.
But two women who survived from the upper deck claimed on camera (under obvious coercion) that they saw a teenage Asian suicide bomber board the bus in a BBC documentary.
just as another point of interest this is not the first time mr jones has had the misfortune to be in close proximity to a terrorist attack ,plus the fact that he has some knowledge of explosives ,timers ,and detonators ,if you add these facts to his testiment that he was at one scene of crime ,what you have is not a wiyness but the main suspect
Google has helped change the way we interact with information on the internet, I think they could continue down this path with improvements to their news service. ,
Hi, I totally agree with most of the comments as we are all manipulated and lied to constantly. The media really knows how to push the buttons of blind individuals.
So I think people on here are doing a good job trumpeting the truth.